[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#594179: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:30:19PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.02.2011 11:13, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >[ CCing Matthias, as I'd like your opinion on my proposed solution
> >   involving some Debian gcc changes. ]

> The armhf patch for gcc looks ok, however I would like to see this
> better addressed in Linaro and/or upstream.

I'm not sure how Linaro could better address this, short of persuading
upstream to allocate a separate triplet for armhf - which has been
explicitly refused on the upstream mailing list.  Do you have something else
in mind here?

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: