Re: License audit on dpkg source tree
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:59:52PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:29:31 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yeah, looks like I did at least some of this on work time. Please go
> > ahead and make that change, although I think it is useful to have
> > authors documented as well as copyright holders (where there's a
> > distinction) so you might like to figure out a way to make that clear.
> Well if some was on your own, then that'd be your copyright no? or was
> it not significant enough?
I don't recall it being significant. The patch you sent is fine by me.
(The same may apply to Ian's and James' contributions to this file, but
you'd have to ask them about that.)
Colin Watson [email@example.com]