[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#274747: dependency on dpkg-dev is not required for provides

Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:05:18PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Another option is that all the Provides: part of type-handling is done
> on dpkg. The current problem with the implementation:
> - A rebuild of type-handling is needed each time a new architecture is
>   added to dpkg.
> - Provides do not always work as an alternative. This require for
>   example type-handling to be installed on the build daemons 
>   (technically it should be an Essential package for this to work).
> That's why I am not really for more usage of type-handling, which IMHO
> should simply disappear.

This gets even worse with multiarch.

Depending on the dpkg config (what archs to allow, and any multiarch
config will break something) the type-handling will break down.


amd64 + i386: amd64 has not-i386 and i386 has not-amd64. It is kind of
strange that you are both i386 and not-i386 but that is multiarch for

amd64 + kfreebsd-amd64: Now you have linux and not-linux.

I already saw some nice confusing effects of this with ia32-apt-get
and had to blacklist type-handling from the non-native archs.


Reply to: