Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)
On Tue March 11 2008 10:45:43 pm Guillem Jover wrote:
> Anyway, after the freeze was announced it was clear that Ian was not
> going to fix the branch, and because having this feature for lenny is
> highly desirable I was just going to have to fix it myself and review
> during that process, but got quite sick for a week, during which he
> started all this mess.
By "fix" you mean rewrite the history, it appears. The end result would be
the same either way.
I think both you and Ian are making a mountain out of a molehill here. So
what if the history isn't pretty? It won't impact anybody running dpkg. It
likely won't even impact the people hacking on dpkg. In fact, 2 years
hence, I bet nobody cares. Just git merge and be done with it.
In the overall picture, it's just not that important.
-- John
Reply to: