Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz

To: debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:14:39 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071007161439.GA12751@scowler.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87abquzzua.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
References: <[🔎] 20071005231612.GA7642@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20071007061354.GA31717@blae.erisian.com.au> <[🔎] 20071007135439.GB11340@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 87abquzzua.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>

On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:52:45AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         What does this mean in non-git context?

I think truncating the patch-log history is unimportant for Arch,
but any ++pristine-trees should definitely be nuked prior to packing.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@ieee.org>

References:
- [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@ieee.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread