[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] proposed v3 source format using .git.tar.gz



Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> One thing I forgot:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:16:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > @@ -825,14 +881,17 @@ if ($opmode eq 'build') {
> >      if ($native) {
> >  	warning(_g("multiple tarfiles in native package")) if @tarfiles > 1;
> >  	warning(_g("native package with .orig.tar"))
> > -	    unless $seen{'.tar'} or $seen{"-$revision.tar"};
> > +	    unless $seen{'.tar'} or $seen{"-$revision.tar"} or %vcsfiles;
> >      } else {
> > -	warning(_g("no upstream tarfile in Files field")) unless $seen{'.orig.tar'};
> > +	warning(_g("no upstream tarfile in Files field")) unless $seen{'.orig.tar'} or %vcsfiles;
> 
> This should probably error out. Aren't v3 packages always native in the
> sense tested here?

Not necessarily. I wanted to leave the option open to use wig-n-pen to
constuct mixed source packages that maybe use vcs for debian/ and
pristine source for the rest + a diff.gz, or something like that.

I think the code will basically handle unpacking such a mongrel,
although there are no tools to create one.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: