[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SE/Linux] status / progress report 13jun2004

On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 21:02 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:46, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > The alternative to this is to patch dpkg with SE Linux support in the
> > > way that rpm has been.  Should I implement the needed functionality in
> > > that manner?
> >
> > I would suggest that. SE Linux is an exception in that it needs to
> > update file system attributes for /any/ installed package. Creating too
> > generic solutions to such highly exceptional situations seems overly
> > broad to me.
> Your suggestion makes sense to me.
That would be the suggestion that has utterly failed to be elaborated,

What is "the way that rpm has been [patched]" ?

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: