[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#133640: A fix

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 23:31 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:

> This bug would be 'grave' if hurd-i386 was a released architecture.
No, it would still be "important" -- it doesn't make the package
unusable or mostly so.

> I've just talked to Neal again and he still thinks the patch is good.
> So, could you please apply it for your next upload? This is really a
> nasty showstopper for the Hurd port right now.
Will have a check myself, but looks reasonable.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: