[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#64471: marked as done ([DOC] dpkg(1) refers to nonexistent info pages)



Your message dated Fri, 07 May 2004 01:21:35 +0100
with message-id <1083889295.2803.47.camel@localhost>
and subject line No longer relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2000 00:43:47 +0000
>From joey@silk.kitenet.net Sun May 21 19:43:47 2000
Return-path: <joey@silk.kitenet.net>
Received: from adsl-63-193-116-241.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (silk) [63.193.116.241] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
	id 12tgJu-0006QD-00; Sun, 21 May 2000 19:43:46 -0500
Received: from joey by silk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 12sxA8-0001pu-00; Fri, 19 May 2000 17:30:40 -0700
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:30:40 -0700
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org, skud@netizen.com.au
Subject: dpkg(1) refers to nonexistent info pages
Message-ID: <20000519173040.B4462@silk.kitenet.net>
Mail-Followup-To: submit@bugs.debian.org, skud@netizen.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@silk.kitenet.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.6.12.99

dpkg(1) says:

       It should not be used by package  maintainers  wishing  to
       understand  how  dpkg  will  install  their packages.  The
       descriptions of what dpkg does when installing and  remov­
       ing  packages  are  particularly inadequate.  For detailed
       information about this, please refer to the  Package  Man­
       agement System topic under debian-faq in the GNU Info sys­
       tem.  For information about creating Debian packages,  see
       the  Debian  Package  Management  Tools  topic in the same
       place.

joey@silk:~>zgrep -i 'Debian Package Management Tools' /usr/share/info/*
joey@silk:~>zgrep -i 'Package Management System' /usr/share/info/*
joey@silk:~>zgrep -i 'debian-faq' /usr/share/info/*

This should be changed to point to documentation that actually exists.
I suggest the Packaging Manual and the Developer's Reference.

-- 
see shy jo

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 64471-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2004 00:21:38 +0000
>From scott@netsplit.com Thu May 06 17:21:38 2004
Return-path: <scott@netsplit.com>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34] (qmailr)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLt7R-0002BX-00; Thu, 06 May 2004 17:21:37 -0700
Received: (qmail 10203 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 00:21:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO syndicate.netsplit.com) (scott@62.49.129.42)
  by populous.netsplit.com with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 7 May 2004 00:21:35 -0000
Subject: No longer relevant
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
To: 64471-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-asV2kmRnP/jTwfeKoOVf"
Message-Id: <1083889295.2803.47.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7 
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 01:21:35 +0100
Delivered-To: 64471-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--=-asV2kmRnP/jTwfeKoOVf
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The incorrect documentation this bug refers to is no longer present.

Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

--=-asV2kmRnP/jTwfeKoOVf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAmtaOIexP3IStZ2wRAkc5AJ92//13XQIHwb/8fpNV8M4QJy8A9gCaAuoj
KTVI2Toy6dAwfPVhHPGr6Lo=
=D7RE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-asV2kmRnP/jTwfeKoOVf--



Reply to: