[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#15823: marked as done ([SEGFAULT] dpkg: found core in /var/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/ after dselect upgrade)



Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:48:51 +0100
with message-id <1079390931.1937.192.camel@localhost>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 1997 08:00:06 +0000
Received: (qmail 29151 invoked from network); 11 Dec 1997 08:00:05 -0000
Received: from bittersweet.inetarena.com (karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com@206.129.216.38)
  by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 11 Dec 1997 08:00:05 -0000
Received: (from karlheg@localhost)
	by bittersweet.inetarena.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id AAA02459;
	Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:07:17 -0800
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 00:07:17 -0800
Message-Id: <199712110807.AAA02459@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
From: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
Subject: dpkg: found core in /var/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/ after dselect upgrade
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.0.1

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.4.0.19

I found a core file in "/var/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/" after doing a dselect upgrade.
Here's what `where' shows, hope this helps.  I've no idea what caused it... perhaps
a corrupt .deb?  When the files got scanned, it said that lesstifg-dbg (I cannot find
it now, I think it got removed.) was corrupt.

 I'll hold onto the core file for you for a few days just in case there's anything
useful you can get from it.  Please let me know if I can just delete it.

Core was generated by `dpkg -iGREOB debian'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
find_solib: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error

#0  0x804f6b4 in _start ()
(gdb) where
#0  0x804f6b4 in _start ()
#1  0x8062806 in printforhelp ()
#2  0x40015c49 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libdpkg.so.0.0
#3  0x80532d6 in _start ()
#4  0x80518ae in _start ()
#5  0x804b1a9 in _start ()

-- System Information
Debian Release: 1.3.1
Kernel Version: Linux bittersweet 2.0.32 #4 Sun Dec 7 17:00:59 PST 1997 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages dpkg depends on:
libc6	Version: 2.0.6-0.2
libg++272	Version: 2.7.2.8-0.1
ncurses3.4	Version: 1.9.9g-6
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 15823-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 22:49:30 +0000
>From jdthood@yahoo.co.uk Mon Mar 15 14:49:30 2004
Return-path: <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B30tm-0001us-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:49:30 -0800
Received: (qmail 8376 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2004 22:48:58 -0000
Received: from 81-91-5-95-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos) (81.91.5.95)
  by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 15 Mar 2004 22:48:58 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E8510D852
	for <15823-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:48:51 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Closing
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: 15823-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1079390931.1937.192.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:48:51 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 15823-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

There is no point in keeping this old unreproducible bug
report around six years after it was filed with no responses
to the request for more information.
-- 
Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>



Reply to: