On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 20:44, Jarno Elonen wrote: > Sorry for annoyingly repeating myself, but I'd really like to know what the > plans are regarding conffile merge support. The fact is, I've been asked to > start maintaining an unofficial, parallel, patched branch of dpkg that would > include the patch for #120152 (probably because I initially provided a > precompiled binary for testing and it stayed up to date for many months). > I can only speak for myself here, but my current priority wrt dpkg is to make a serious crater in the open bug list. Things like new conffile support would be destined for trunk/HEAD, rather than the stable branch. I'm not sure what the state of the patch on #120152 is. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part