Bug#173205: marked as done (dpkg-dev: dpkg-architecture revert to i386)
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:32:23 -0500
with message-id <20030823043222.GJ16079@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
and subject line dpkg-dev: dpkg-architecture revert to i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2002 18:39:56 +0000
>From pierre@arcanes.homelinux.net Sun Dec 15 12:39:56 2002
Return-path: <pierre@arcanes.homelinux.net>
Received: from astrasbourg-206-1-13-10.abo.wanadoo.fr (imperatrice.arcanes) [80.15.168.10] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18NdgB-0007jB-00; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:39:55 -0600
Received: from bateleur.arcanes (bateleur.arcanes [192.168.1.1])
by imperatrice.arcanes (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 00D918E097; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:40:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bateleur.arcanes (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E231F7BBD; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:39:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:39:09 +0100
From: Pierre THIERRY <pierre.thierry@moine-fou.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dpkg-dev: dpkg-architecture revert to i386
Message-ID: <20021215183909.GA4795@bateleur.arcanes>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19-bateleur i686
X-Sheldon-Has-Said: Mange ton =?iso-8859-1?B?Y+Jj4uI=?= !
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.10.9
Severity: normal
In dpkg-architecture (line 39) :
# 1.0.6 Revert to i386 to comply with policy =A7 5.1.
But the policy doesn't tell anything about to obligation to revert
anything in its =A7 5.1, because that =A7 deals about timestamps ! In fact,
it is a problem when you want to compile for a specific Intel arch...
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bateleur.arcanes 2.4.19-bateleur #1 ven ao=FB 16 03:37:33 CES=
T 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR@euro
Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii binutils 2.13.90.0.10-1 The GNU assembler, linker and =
bina
ii cpio 2.5-1 GNU cpio -- a program to manag=
e ar
ii make 3.79.1-15 The GNU version of the "make" =
util
ii patch 2.5.4-11 Apply a diff file to an origin=
al
ii perl [perl5] 5.6.1-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extract=
ion=20
ii perl-modules 5.6.1-7 Core Perl modules.
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9/MxNxe13INnVDYoRAqz3AKCg9EZpykY8lY56FPZc3DqK+9/JWwCgj6Rc
Qb37R+1QkUvDbsbOktI5iCo=
=CXzV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173205-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2003 04:32:26 +0000
>From vorlon@netexpress.net Fri Aug 22 23:32:24 2003
Return-path: <vorlon@netexpress.net>
Received: from quetzlcoatl.dodds.net [64.22.202.19]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19qQ4e-0005kA-00; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:32:24 -0500
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8C1743AE0; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:32:23 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:32:23 -0500
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
To: 173205-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: dpkg-dev: dpkg-architecture revert to i386
Message-ID: <20030823043222.GJ16079@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/rDaUNvWv5XYRSKj"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 173205-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--/rDaUNvWv5XYRSKj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm sure the policy section # has changed since that code was written
(possibly =A711.1 now), but dpkg-architecture's current behavior i
still correct -- 'dpkg-architecture' when called alone should give the
name of the *base* architecture. If you want to compile for a specific
Intel subarch, you should call dpkg-architecture with the '-a' option,
as when running 'dpkg-buildpackage -ai686'.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--/rDaUNvWv5XYRSKj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Ru5WKN6ufymYLloRAj8sAJ0ZrR3IZ3nBj+UiBXvsEIrUV/fZTgCfT+IS
FpG08xosFwoSmtEiqpyuuk8=
=+jLS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/rDaUNvWv5XYRSKj--
Reply to: