Bug#161484: marked as done (dpkg's md5sum doesn't come with large-file support)
Your message dated Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:01:13 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209191000020.1034-100000@yakko.doogie.org>
and subject line Bug#161484: dpkg's md5sum doesn't come with large-file support
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2002 12:39:47 +0000
>From rabe@lkt.uni-erlangen.de Thu Sep 19 07:39:47 2002
Return-path: <rabe@lkt.uni-erlangen.de>
Received: from www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.28.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17s0ax-0005dv-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 07:39:47 -0500
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1]:51340 (amavis)
by WWW.LKT.Uni-Erlangen.DE with esmtp (Exim 4.10 #1 (Debian))
id 17s0ay-0005bB-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:39:48 +0200
Received: from rabe by WWW.LKT.Uni-Erlangen.DE with local (Exim 4.10 #1 (Debian))
id 17s0aw-0005b5-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:39:46 +0200
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:39:45 +0200
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@mail.lkt.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dpkg's md5sum doesn't come with large-file support
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020919123945.GA21266@WWW.LKT.Uni-Erlangen.DE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Sender: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@LKT.Uni-Erlangen.DE>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Razor-id: c4fa40980bfa460c985784c48a0cc92ef6c1a333
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.9.21
Severity: important
Tried to compute md5sum of 4GB file:
$ls -la debian*
-rw-r--r-- 1 rabe rabe 4342153216 Sep 19 14:10 debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
$ md5sum -b debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso: File too large
$ l /usr/bin/md5sum*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17032 May 16 19:50 /usr/bin/md5sum
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13764 Mar 7 2002 /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
textutils: /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/md5sum
dpkg: /usr/bin/md5sum
$ md5sum.textutils -b debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
58f2d526d1c1a8f0582f7f65e30cd2b9 *debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
Shouldn't dpkg rename its "md5sum" so that the user doesn't inadvertantly
invoke it in favor of textutil's md5sum?
Thanks,
Ralf
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mysystem.domain.de 2.4.18-xfs #1 Fri Apr 12 23:07:56 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-7 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-7 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 161484-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2002 15:02:16 +0000
>From doogie@debian.org Thu Sep 19 10:02:16 2002
Return-path: <doogie@debian.org>
Received: from 12-238-101-237.client.attbi.com (yakko.doogie.org) [12.238.101.237] (uucp)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17s2oq-0000q7-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:02:16 -0500
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (uucp)
by yakko.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 17s2np-0003DA-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:01:13 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:01:13 -0500 (CDT)
From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
X-X-Sender: <adam@yakko.doogie.org>
To: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@mail.lkt.uni-erlangen.de>,
<161484-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#161484: dpkg's md5sum doesn't come with large-file support
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20020919123945.GA21266@WWW.LKT.Uni-Erlangen.DE>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209191000020.1034-100000@yakko.doogie.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 161484-done@bugs.debian.org
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.9.21
> Severity: important
>
> Tried to compute md5sum of 4GB file:
>
> $ls -la debian*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 rabe rabe 4342153216 Sep 19 14:10 debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
>
> $ md5sum -b debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
> debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso: File too large
Upgrade to dpkg 1.10, or later.
> $ l /usr/bin/md5sum*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17032 May 16 19:50 /usr/bin/md5sum
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13764 Mar 7 2002 /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
>
> $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
> textutils: /usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
> $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/md5sum
> dpkg: /usr/bin/md5sum
>
> $ md5sum.textutils -b debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
> 58f2d526d1c1a8f0582f7f65e30cd2b9 *debian-30r0_NONUS-i386-binary-1.iso
>
> Shouldn't dpkg rename its "md5sum" so that the user doesn't inadvertantly
> invoke it in favor of textutil's md5sum?
No. dpkg was there first.
Reply to: