RE: where should patches be sent?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wichert Akkerman [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 8:32 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: where should patches be sent?
> Previously Robert Collins wrote:
> > We will cheat, the same way tar does. We make packing and unpacking
> > idempotent and assume that all programs that care have been ported
> > properly.
> In that case you'll loose when dealing with binary-all package. Better
> make sure the interpreters can deal with it :)
Oh, and BTW: Don't worry about this issue. It's been solved and beaten
to death a long time ago for tar/zip/gzip/bzip2/ar. So we've simply to
follow the existing pattern.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com