Bug#145714: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work correctly on the Hurd
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.9.20
Hi,
the below patch fixes the issue announced in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2002/debian-dpkg-200204/msg00094.html
This patchs will work good enough for now. If there will ever be two
libraries with the same name in different lib/ directories on the Hurd,
we will have to take another look at it. However, such a situation
would be abnormal, and I don't expect it ever to occur (the only reason
it helped in GNU/Linux is that the linker had some kludges to figure it
out based on the C library linked to).
Please apply this patch, so that packages will have the right
dependencies on the Hurd. It will make dpkg look in all */lib/
directories for the libraried accept any of the pathes, regardless
what ldd says on that issue, but only on the GNU system.
Thanks,
Marcus
--- dpkg-shlibdeps.orig Fri May 3 20:15:33 2002
+++ dpkg-shlibdeps Fri May 3 20:10:29 2002
@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
@depfields= qw(Suggests Recommends Depends Pre-Depends);
+# Determine if we are running on the GNU/Hurd system,
+# and if we do, don't let us fool by ldd's output.
+$use_ldd = (`uname -s` =~ m/^GNU/) ? 0 : 1;
+
push(@INC,$dpkglibdir);
require 'controllib.pl';
@@ -94,17 +98,20 @@
for ($i=0;$i<=$#exec;$i++) {
if (!isbin ($exec[$i])) { next; }
- # First we get an ldd output to see what libs + paths we have at out
- # disposal.
- my %so2path = ();
- defined($c= open(P,"-|")) || syserr("cannot fork for ldd");
- if (!$c) { exec("ldd","--",$exec[$i]); syserr("cannot exec ldd"); }
- while (<P>) {
- if (m,^\s+(\S+)\s+=>\s+(\S+)\s+\(0x.+\)?$,) {
- $so2path{$1} = $2;
+ if ($use_ldd)
+ {
+ # First we get an ldd output to see what libs + paths we have at out
+ # disposal.
+ my %so2path = ();
+ defined($c= open(P,"-|")) || syserr("cannot fork for ldd");
+ if (!$c) { exec("ldd","--",$exec[$i]); syserr("cannot exec ldd"); }
+ while (<P>) {
+ if (m,^\s+(\S+)\s+=>\s+(\S+)\s+\(0x.+\)?$,) {
+ $so2path{$1} = $2;
+ }
}
+ close(P); $? && subprocerr("ldd on \`$exec[$i]'");
}
- close(P); $? && subprocerr("ldd on \`$exec[$i]'");
# Now we get the direct deps of the program. We then check back with
# the ldd output from above to see what our path is.
@@ -117,14 +124,22 @@
push(@libname,$2);
push(@libsoname,$3);
push(@libf,$execf[$i]);
- &warn("could not find path for $1") unless defined($so2path{$1});
- push(@libfiles,$so2path{$1});
+ if ($use_ldd) {
+ &warn("could not find path for $1") unless defined($so2path{$1});
+ push(@libfiles,$so2path{$1});
+ } else {
+ push(@libfiles,"*/lib/$1");
+ }
} elsif (m,^\s*NEEDED\s+((\S+)-(\S+)\.so)$,) {
push(@libname,$2);
push(@libsoname,$3);
push(@libf,$execf[$i]);
- &warn("could not find path for $1") unless defined($so2path{$1});
- push(@libfiles,$so2path{$1});
+ if ($use_ldd) {
+ &warn("could not find path for $1") unless defined($so2path{$1});
+ push(@libfiles,$so2path{$1});
+ } else {
+ push(@libfiles,"*/lib/$1");
+ }
} else {
m,^\s*NEEDED\s+(\S+)$,;
&warn("format of $1 not recognized");
@@ -198,7 +213,14 @@
&warn("diversions involved - output may be incorrect");
print(STDERR " $_\n") || syserr("write diversion info to stderr");
} elsif (m=^(\S+(, \S+)*): (\S+)$=) {
- push @{$pathpackages{$+}}, split(/, /, $1);
+ if ($use_ldd) {
+ push @{$pathpackages{$+}}, split(/, /, $1);
+ } else {
+ my $pkgnames = $1;
+ my $libpath = $+;
+ $libpath =~ s=^.*(/lib/[^/]+)$=*$1=;
+ push @{$pathpackages{$libpath}}, split(/, /, $pkgnames);
+ }
} else {
&warn("unknown output from dpkg --search: \`$_'");
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: