Re: seemingly reproducable dpkg segfault
Previously Adam Heath wrote:
> Fyi, I already knew this. I've seen dpkg overruning the stack(I compiled a
> debug version for Sean's test case), which then causes it to return into the
> middle of __libc_start_main, which of course makes it die.
I bet it's the memory overwrite in the largemem code I found.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |