[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seemingly reproducable dpkg segfault



On 22-Dec-2000 Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> 
>> Steps:
>> 
>> grab base.tgz from potato
>> setup resolv.conf and sources.list for potato
>> chroot in
>> apt-get install dpkg-dev build-essential (due to a bug in apt, you have to
>> isntall dpkg-dev first)
>> apt-get install strace (you won't get the chance later)
>> apt-get install libncurses5-dev libreadline4-dev libssl09-dev libzvt-dev
>> ...
>> ...
>> segfault
> 
> Funny, no segfault for me.  After adding -o Debug::pkgDPkgPM=true to the
> apt-get lines, then, manually running dpkg in the right order, instead of
> having apt do it, I get no segfault.
> 

Unpacking libgtk1.2-dev (from .../libgtk1.2-dev_1.2.7-1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libjpeg62-dev.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg recieved a segmentation fault.

attached is the script.

Attachment: dpkg.segfault
Description: dpkg.segfault


Reply to: