Bug#31521: dpkg: dpkg dying in eterm
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 09:43:27AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > priority. I suspect, however, that eterm does not really gratuitously
> > go around ignoring sigals like that.
> Indeed not. I just spoke with the author, Eterm doesn't touch SIGPIPE.
> For info on what signals it ignores, grep SIG_IGN src/*.c
Indeed. That was an honest mistake on someone's part, attributing it to
eterm.
The culprit is gnome-session (and possibly some other gnome tools - I
suspect, but haven't checked, panel).
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: