Re: release-notes bug triage
Richard Lewis <richard.lewis.debian@googlemail.com> writes:
> Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22-12-2024 19:08, Richard Lewis wrote:
>>> Currently the page has several that relate to bookworm (and some
>>> before): should anything relating to bookworm or earlier be closed? is
>>> it still desirable/possible to amend the bookworm release-notes?
>>
>> bookworm release-notes can be updated until bookworm is no longer
>> supported by the Release-Team and security support. So, only bugs only
>> applicable for bullseye and before should be closed at this stage.
>
> OK, maybe ill look at some of these -- for the bookworm release-notes,
> does that mean a MR against the bookworm branch? (which is still in
> docbook format, i assume the support for building docbook is still
> there, --- or am i just confused...
>
> how do i view the different branches? (i cant get either to build
> locally)
>
> (Ill reply to individual bugs, but i seem to be a bit confused by the
> git repo at the moment)
I worked it out:
bookworm (docbook) is https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/
trixie (rst) is https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/index.en.html
Unfortunately https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/amd64/release-notes/ is a 404, i wonder if
someone could make those pages redirect to the correct trixie pages?
My remaining question is: will commits to https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/tree/bookworm?ref_type=heads
still make it to the bookworm page?
Reply to: