Hi, I noticed info2www fell out of testing a while back, but has been abandoned upstream and doesn't look maintained in Debian. Do people think it's worth trying to keep it alive? I was willing to salvage it and update the packaging to current standards, though I'm not sure how well I could fix a security issue in a perl cgi script if someone finds something still wrong in a 14 year program. I asked a bit on #debian-devel in irc and seemed like keeping an old cgi script running is perhaps questionable, and that perhaps packages that currently only ship info docs should also ship html documentation. For what it's worth generating html documentation directly from the texinfo source with texi2any --html does make nicer documentation than is possible with info2www. I thought it worth asking the doc team what you all thought. Diane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part