Bug#990940: release-notes: wpewebkit to be covered by security support in bullseye

[Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>]

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:

> If we can refer to "webkit" and "khtml" (in the previous line) and
> "Firefox" and "Chromium" (below) without special markup, it's not
> clear why we need make such a big deal about "*webkit2gtk*" and
> "*wpewebkit*" being source package names.  I would suggest just:
> 
>    	  mentioned here, with the exception of webkit2gtk and
>           the new wpewebkit.</para></footnote> are included in
> 	  &releasename;, but not covered by security support. These
>           browsers should not be used against untrusted websites.
> 	  The webkit2gtk and wpewebkit engines
>           <emphasis>are</emphasis> covered by security support.

Ok, here's a new patch.

Berto

diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk
index d0940906..827ee75f 100644
--- a/en/issues.dbk
+++ b/en/issues.dbk
@@ -506,12 +506,11 @@ data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/some/path/$domain_data/aliases}}
 	  engines<footnote><para>These engines are shipped in a number of different
 	  source packages and the concern applies to all packages shipping
 	  them. The concern also extends to web rendering engines not explicitly
-	  mentioned here, with the exception of <systemitem
-	  role="source">webkit2gtk</systemitem>.</para></footnote> are included in
-	  &releasename;, but not
+	  mentioned here, with the exception of webkit2gtk and the new
+	  wpewebkit.</para></footnote> are included in &releasename;, but not
 	  covered by security support. These browsers should not be used against
 	  untrusted websites.
-	  The <systemitem role="source">webkit2gtk</systemitem> source package is
+	  The webkit2gtk and wpewebkit engines <emphasis>are</emphasis>
 	  covered by security support.
 	</para>
 	<para>