On Mi, 30 iun 21, 22:22:12, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Samuels text was already pretty good. Attached a diff, ready to push. > > Paul > > + <section id="rdiff-backup"> > + <title>rdiff-backup require lockstep upgrade of server and client</title> > + <para> > + The network protocol of versions 1 and 2 of <systemitem > + role="package">rdiff-backup</systemitem> are incompatible. This > + means that you must be running the same version (either 1 or 2) > + of <systemitem role="package">rdiff-backup</systemitem> locally > + and remotely. Since buster ships version 1.2.8 and bullseye > + ships version 2.0.5, upgrading only the local system or only the > + remote system from buster to bullseye will break <systemitem > + role="package">rdiff-backup</systemitem> runs between the two. > + </para> > + <para> > + For conveniency, version 2.0.5 of <systemitem > + role="package">rdiff-backup</systemitem> is available in the > + buster-backports distribution, see <ulink > + url="https://backports.debian.org/";>backports</ulink>. This > + enables users to first upgrade only the <systemitem > + role="package">rdiff-backup</systemitem> package on their buster > + systems, and then independently upgrade systems to bullseye at > + their convenience. > + </para> > + </section> As far as I know typically we refer to backports as an 'archive', especially since it is an add-on for stable, so s/distribution/archive/, otherwise it looks good to me, for what it's worth. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature