[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#983353: marked as done (gnome-control-center is still not accessible with Orca screenreader)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Feb 2021 22:08:02 +0100
with message-id <0ade5d3d-221b-d57f-0571-683c353a054e@debian.org>
and subject line Committed release-notes changes
has caused the Debian Bug report #983353,
regarding gnome-control-center is still not accessible with Orca screenreader
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
983353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes

Hi,

To avoid to forget it

On 21-02-2021 22:15, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, le sam. 06 févr. 2021 10:10:33 +0100, a ecrit:
>> One release further. Can somebody, e.g. from the Debian Accessibility
>> Team, please at least check if this is still an issue? If not, we can
>> close the bug, if so, we can document it *again* [1] as I'm not
>> expecting it to get fixed in these last months if it's not fixed already.
> 
> I had a look, it looks like it is exactly in the same state as before:
> having to press right arrow twice, having to use control-f then esc to
> get back to the panel list (not able to select a result element with the
> keyboard). So the same text would be needed.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
These bugs have been fixed, thanks for your contribution.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: