Re: odd emacs version in project-history

[Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>]

Hi,

Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi
> I think the mistake is in "Emacs", it should be Exim (Exim 4.88 was
> shipped with Debian 9 stretch):
> 
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html

I have merged that MR. Thanks

Holger



> El 13/4/20 a las 9:18, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY escribió:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > 황병희 writes:
> > 
> >> While i read the project history, i found somewhat odd words which was
> >> Emacs version [1] for Stretch release.
> >>
> >> There is special Emacs version naming rule?
> >>
> >> [1] "Emacs 4.88":
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/blob/master/project-history.en.dbk#L1435
> > 
> > This version number 4.88 comes from Javier's commit
> > 41a115fd66703a32e728f6cc3ddbc207dac5ac02.
> > 
> > This looks like a little mistake to me indeed; apparently in Stretch the
> > latest Emacs version available is 25.1.
> > 
> > I guess 25.1 is the correct version?  I've just created this merge
> > request [2], can we merge it?
> > 
> > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/merge_requests/5
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > --
> > Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
> > PGP 015AE9B25DCB0511D200A75DE5674DEA514C891D
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Laura Arjona Reina
> https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
> 


-- 
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076