Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:33:40 +0200 with message-id <82c89645-ea22-a92d-86d0-756e58fe6367@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages has caused the Debian Bug report #901193, regarding There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 901193: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901193 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages
- From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:08:07 +0800
- Message-id: <87d0x2qjoo.fsf@jidanni.org>
Package: general There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages. One has to grep for the words transitional / dummy in their descriptions to find them. They should all have a standard Tag:. And the Debian documentation should mention what apt command will remove them.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 901193-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#901193: Bug#901003: There is no standard way of removing transitional / dummy packages
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:33:40 +0200
- Message-id: <82c89645-ea22-a92d-86d0-756e58fe6367@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 079bd499-1b39-5f4e-c247-3d1a4532744a@debian.org>
- References: <87fu1x8eug.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <707eb0990075ba875ccb624cf6f43055bc6a9c4d.camel@decadent.org.uk> <707eb0990075ba875ccb624cf6f43055bc6a9c4d.camel@decadent.org.uk> <87d0x2qjoo.fsf@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 7a3a83a2-6c97-8a44-ab8c-a98313e163d6@debian.org> <[🔎] 20190327003008.cxaux4ia76hhczec@jbr.me.uk> <87d0x2qjoo.fsf@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 20190327142341.eylv6shbrlxqt2lu@jbr.me.uk> <[🔎] 20190327225256.eryfrtiokzerwqwi@mayhem.atnf.CSIRO.AU> <[🔎] 20190328001741.fgvmbc4i6zmduby5@jbr.me.uk> <87d0x2qjoo.fsf@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 20190328002225.xvilmcyblk7ylpyk@mayhem.atnf.CSIRO.AU> <[🔎] 079bd499-1b39-5f4e-c247-3d1a4532744a@debian.org> <[🔎] 079bd499-1b39-5f4e-c247-3d1a4532744a@debian.org>
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 21:22:43 +0100 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > > On 28-03-2019 01:22, Vincent.Mcintyre@csiro.au wrote: > > Works for me. > > And for me. So I have locally committed the attached changes which I > will push if no comments appear in the next two days. Done so now: https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/commit/47a7c54 PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---