Your message dated Sun, 15 Sep 2019 20:21:47 +0200 with message-id <f07ab660-1f5e-96c1-353f-7bb9adee7d03@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#939178: release-notes: Describe name selection rules in the "Migrating from legacy network interface names" section has caused the Debian Bug report #939178, regarding release-notes: Describe name selection rules in the "Migrating from legacy network interface names" section to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 939178: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939178 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: release-notes: Describe name selection rules in the "Migrating from legacy network interface names" section
- From: Dmitry Semyonov <linulin@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 05:35:25 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAGUoffA+hmcjCGWrFzmVbGYGsBBTsdgrw8ZVit3-T7bw1vvLbw@mail.gmail.com>
Package: release-notes Severity: important The 5.1.5 section of the document[1] contains the following text: [1]https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#migrate-interface-names "(If the udevadm output includes an “onboard” name, that takes priority; MAC-based names are normally treated as a fallback, but may be needed for USB network hardware.)" This text should be changed to something like this: udevadm may list several potential names for a single interface. In this case the final name is assigned according to the following list of decreasing priorities: * ID_NET_NAME_FROM_DATABASE * ID_NET_NAME_ONBOARD * ID_NET_NAME_SLOT * ID_NET_NAME_PATH * ID_NET_NAME_MAC (MAC-based names are normally used only for USB network hardware.) It is important to make the right choice when migrating interface names on a remote system! -- ...Bye..Dmitry.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com>, 939178-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#939178: release-notes: Describe name selection rules in the "Migrating from legacy network interface names" section
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 20:21:47 +0200
- Message-id: <f07ab660-1f5e-96c1-353f-7bb9adee7d03@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20190915102233.GA1548@jbr.me.uk>
- References: <[🔎] CAGUoffA+hmcjCGWrFzmVbGYGsBBTsdgrw8ZVit3-T7bw1vvLbw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20190902112529.GA16261@jbr.me.uk> <[🔎] CAGUoffDv+6vjV9wRZ8y=X3ejUmz6TCdSq=S0xC8XJf0q--rf-g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20190902192543.GA4545@jbr.me.uk> <[🔎] 20190912131444.GA12879@jbr.me.uk> <[🔎] CAGUoffA+hmcjCGWrFzmVbGYGsBBTsdgrw8ZVit3-T7bw1vvLbw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20190915102233.GA1548@jbr.me.uk>
Hi Justin, On 15-09-2019 12:22, Justin B Rye wrote: > Here's a patch for the Release Notes adding another common corner-case > to the list of things to beware of, plus an updated set of external > links including "https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames". Applied. PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---