On Sb, 20 apr 19, 18:40:17, Justin B Rye wrote: > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Justin B Rye wrote: > >> The "hidepid" mount-options for /proc (as recommended by various > > > > Why plural? Both the wiki and proc(5) are using singular. > > You're right - I was thinking of "hidepid=0/1/2" as separate options, > but yes, the approved terminology is to call it one option with > multiple possible arguments. I suppose I could argue that it's > only the non-zero arguments that cause problems rather than the > hidepid option itself, but no, here's a patch making it singular. :) > diff --git a/en/issues.dbk b/en/issues.dbk > index 39d27b25..81ed5863 100644 > --- a/en/issues.dbk > +++ b/en/issues.dbk > @@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ information mentioned in <xref linkend="morereading"/>. > > <section id="hidepid-unsupported"> > <!-- stretch to buster--> > - <title>Hidepid mount options for procfs unsupported</title> > + <title>Hidepid mount option for procfs unsupported</title> > <para> > - The <literal>hidepid</literal> mount options for > - <filename>/proc</filename> are known to cause problems with current > - versions of systemd, and are considered by systemd upstream to be an > + Using the <literal>hidepid</literal> mount option for > + <filename>/proc</filename> is known to cause problems with current > + versions of systemd, and is considered by systemd upstream to be an > unsupported configuration. Users who have modified > - <filename>/etc/fstab</filename> to enable these options are advised to > - disable them before the upgrade, to ensure login sessions work on > - &releasename;. (A possible route to re-enabling them is outlined on the > + <filename>/etc/fstab</filename> to enable this option are advised to > + disable it before the upgrade, to ensure login sessions work on > + &releasename;. (A possible route to re-enabling it is outlined on the Any particular reason for using "&releasename;" instead of "buster"? At least for me it's easier to read (and understand) the source text without so much markup. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature