[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#881771: marked as done (release-notes: No mention of "predictable network interface names" in Debian 10)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2019 20:11:12 +0200
with message-id <bc78fa37-341d-6d6a-e69c-5b0f2f4c4a45@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#881771: release-notes: No mention of "predictable network interface names" in Debian 10
has caused the Debian Bug report #881771,
regarding release-notes: No mention of "predictable network interface names" in Debian 10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
881771: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881771
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

Hi,

Section 4.7 "Preparing for the next release" of the jessie->stretch
release notes do not mention that Debian 10 will require migration to
the kernel's "predictable network names".  (Or, I imagine, manual
assignment of network names.)

Because users are going to have to migrate anyway it might be useful
to do so sooner rather than later and "prepare for the next release".  :-)

See:
/usr/share/doc/udev/README.Debian.gz
https://sources.debian.org/src/systemd/235-2/debian/udev.README.Debian/
Bug#881769

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi all,

On 13-04-2019 19:22, Justin B Rye wrote:
> I wasn't sure exactly where in upgrading.dbk to add it, but here's a
> suggested patch.

Applied here:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/commit/d668ba8

> Meanwhile I notice a new grammar nitpick in issues.dbk: "to login"
> should be "to log in" (just as with "backup", "setup", and so on, the
> noun is a single word, but the verb is two words that can be separated
> in phrases like "log yourself straight back in".).

Applied here:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/commit/faf1fce

Thanks. If needed, further fine-tuning can still be done. Either in a
new bug, but even using this bug if you want (but please use reopen in
that case).

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: