Re: Work on debian-faq?
Hi Javier,
Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> There is a bugreport, filed by myself :-)
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788361
> with a patch.
>
> It contains many typo fixes, missing or unnecessary commas/dots etc.
> These changings should be indisputable, nothing to discuss about, so
> I think they should get committed. (The above bugreport also contains
> some other changings, which might be worth to discuss about, but I would
> leave such changings out for this first step.)
> I could provide a patch, which contains only that indisputable fixes,
> where the fixes do not affect the translations. So I would also unfuzzy
> the po files, to not bother the respective translators with that
> (all active translations are po-based; there is only zh_CN which is
> sgml-based, but that's heavily outdated already, so no need to care about
> that).
> Po-based translations are in a very good shape, nearly all are 100% translated,
> so unfuzzying is easy.
>
>
> What do you think?
> Any objections for this?
> Should I prepare the above mentioned patch?
I have prepared this patch some days ago, and now I saw it is corrupted
due to this commit:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/debian-faq/basic_defs.sgml?r1=10448&r2=11070
So I will prepare a patch once more, will provide it here, and then commit
it 2 days later, if noone objects.
I hope you don't mind
Holger
--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
Reply to: