Re: Last part of the proposed changes to debian-faq
Hi,
Am So. Juni 19 11:09:37 2016 GMT+0200 schrieb victory:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:10:20 +0200
> Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> pkg_basics:487:
> <url id="https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals.en.html#debmake-doc";>.
>
> s/.en.html//
Yes.
> pkgtools:403:
> <p>In these cases, `foo-data' doesn't depend on `foo', so when you
> remove the `foo' package it will not get automatically removed by most
> package management tools. The same holds true for
> the library packages. This is necessary to avoid circular
> dependencies. However, if you use <prgn>apt-get</prgn>
> (see <ref id="apt-get">) or <prgn>aptitude</prgn> (see <ref id="aptitude">)
> as your package management tool, they will
> track automatically installed packages and give the possibility to
> remove them, when no packages needing them remain in your system.
>
> longman:
> need
> 1 [T not in progressive] to have to have something or someone,
> because you cannot do something without them,
> or because you cannot continue or cannot exist without them;
> [=]require:
>
> maybe needing here is invalid?
Yes, better use "depending on them"
> software:24:
> LibreOffice.org productivity suite, Gnumeric and other spreadsheets,
>
> .org?
Yes, LibreOffice does not have the org in its official name.
> uptodate:15:
> shipped on the Debian CDs, DVDs and Blu-Ray discs.
>
> s/Ray/ray/
I'm not sure here, but I'm ok with this change.
> changelog:24:
> * Update section "Debian an the kernel". (Closes: #599018)
>
> s/an/and/ ?
Yes.
Well done! Thanks
Holger
--
Sent from my Jolla phone
http://www.jolla.com/
Reply to: