[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pine (was: Re: debian-faq: patch5 to remove some outdated content)



On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:45:43PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > Holger Wansing wrote:
> > >> 	<p>Some packages are only distributed as source code due to the restrictions
> > >> 	in their licenses. Notably, one such package is <tt>pine</tt>, see
> > >> 	<ref id="pine"> for more information.
> > >> 
> > >> So if we remove pine from the doc, we need another example for such
> > >> nonfree software, which is only allowed to be distributed as source code.
> > >> Is anyone aware of such software?
> > > 
> > > publicfile.  There is https://packages.debian.org/publicfile-installer .
> > 
> > Except that publicfile isn't an example "only distributed as source
> > code".  Debian doesn't distribute even that much - instead the
> > installer package *fetches* that code from upstream.
> 
> Hmm, if there are only few of such packages, that topic is probably not
> worth a frequently asked question (FAQ)?
> So skip the whole sentence?

Isn't one of those packages nvidia's own drivers?  That is, at least, 
an important one, and may be worth a mention.

-- hendrik

> 
> 
> 
> Holger
> 
> 
> > 
> > > Probably there are more examples.
> > 
> > Do things like nvidia-kernel-dkms count?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ============================================================
> Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
> 	D E B I A N   L I N U X   8 . 0   " J E S S I E " .
> 
> Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
> ============================================================
> 


Reply to: