Bug#821119: Fw: Change build mechanism for sk [ Re: Debian refcard: call to update translations ]
Hi,
victory <victory.deb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:59:25 +0200
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > I cannot understand, what you did, which files you watched (with a
> > webbrowser !), and what is so much broken...
>
> http://debian.blog.bbiq.jp/refcard20160420.tbz
> note: r11106 + updated ja; latest fr update is not incorporated
Ok, when watching those pdfs, it really seems that most languages are broken.
But when I build them here (with my patch from #821119 applied), I get fine
pdfs for nearly all languages (at least as far as I can judge).
I would guess you used "make" to build the pdfs?
In that case FOP (or xmlroff ?) is used for the build, but that is not the
correct buildchain for most languages.
Most languages are build using dblatex.
So, "make USE_DBLATEX=1" does the trick.
That leaves only 7 languages with incorrect / incomplete / missing copyright
notice: ar, el, he, hi, ja, zh_CN and zh_TW
All the others look fine.
And now, when I apply your patch from your mail, I get indeed correct copyright
notices for 6 of those remaining 7 languages! Yeah!
So only el has broken copyright notice (it is not displayed at all).
That *IS* an improvement!
Many thanks for your patch
Holger
>
> > With my patch included with this bug, I only changed the cs.po and
> > el.po and sk.po files.
> > So I am unable so see, why this should break so much files or translations.
>
> no.
> your patch broke nothing;
> just did not make significant improvement from the POV
> broken files are broken regardless of your patch applied or not
>
> note: lt version of fr translations is not broken
> but a4 version is broken
>
> if you still cannot understand, never mind and ignore it
> I'm not in trouble with it in any way
>
> --
> victory
> no need to CC me :-)
>
--
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 8 . 0 " J E S S I E " .
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
Reply to: