[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#723613: marked as done (udev in jessie requires a kernel with CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:43:14 +0100
with message-id <54B6B8C2.3070602@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#723613: udev in jessie requires a kernel with CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
has caused the Debian Bug report #723613,
regarding udev in jessie requires a kernel with CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
723613: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723613
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie

udev 176 and newer requires a kernel with devtmpfs support since it no
longer creates any device nodes itself [1].
The Debian provided kernels in wheezy and jessie do have CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y
already, so are not affected by this change. Users with self-compiled
kernels should check their kernel configuration and update if needed.

We should add a section about this new kernel requirement to the jessie
release notes.


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722580

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-11-27 08:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-11-27 07:59, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Added, thanks.
>>
>> ~Niels
>>
>>
> 

Closing as the only remark was fixed.

Thanks,
~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: