[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at least squeeze



Control: reassign -1 installation-guide

Hi maintainers,

I'm reassigning this bug because these words are from
installation-guide, and note from RN.

Dixit Samuel Bronson, le 24/11/2013 :

>Looking at <http://bugs.debian.org/609690>, it seems that gcc has been
>defaulting to -march=i586 at least since squeeze, or r4557 in the GCC
>packaging SVN [1].
>
>This would seem to indicate that you now need at least a 586 to run
>Debian.
>
>However, section 2.1.2.1 CPU of the release notes still says:
>
>> However, Debian GNU/Linux wheezy will not run on 386 or earlier
>> processors. Despite the architecture name "i386", support for actual
>> 80386 processors (and their clones) was dropped with the Sarge
>> (r3.1) release of Debian[2]. (No version of Linux has ever supported
>> the 286 or earlier chips in the series.) All i486 and later
>> processors are still supported[3].

I'd like to add that, despite the fact that gcc has been defaulting to
-march=i586, I succesfully installed wheezy 7.3 inside
"qemu-system-i386 -cpu 486". 
(I've only chosen base install and did not make more tests.)

>This should be updated.

You can find attached a proposed wording for 
d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml

Baptiste
Index: d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml
===================================================================
--- d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml	(révision 69081)
+++ d-i/trunk/manual/en/hardware/supported/i386.xml	(copie de travail)
@@ -36,8 +36,9 @@
 </para>
 
 </footnote>. (No version of Linux has ever supported the 286 or earlier
-chips in the series.)  All i486 and later processors are still
-supported<footnote>
+chips in the series.)  Since the Squeeze release (6.0), gcc uses i586 as default arch ; 
+this means that all i586 and later processors are supported. Debian could still run on i486 
+processors (and their clones), but some packages may not run as expected<footnote>
 
 <para>
 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: