--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Please add a note about slapd
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:01:39 +0100
- Message-id: <20121216140139.30198.35857.reportbug@localhost>
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've uploaded a fix for #665199 (upgrading slapd fails because the
database is dumped using slapcat from the new slapd binary package,
which can't read the old data files) to stable.
If accepted, users of slapd will need to update to this version _before_
updating to unstable. Please make sure this is made clear in the release
notes.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 696068-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#696068: release-notes: #696068: Please add a note about slapd (fwd)
- From: Tomas Pospisek <tpo@sourcepole.ch>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:35:04 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412301932050.4590@hier>
Actually, this is a "wontfix". See message below.
I hope closing this is OK, otherwise please reopen (and let me know
please).
Thanks,
*t
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:13:34 +0100
From: Joost van Baal-Ilić
To: Tomas Pospisek, 696068@b.d.o
Cc: Wouter Verhelst
Subject: Re: Bug#696068: release-notes: #696068: Please add a note about slapd
Hi Tomas,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Hello Wouter & Joost,
What is the state of this bug? I don't understand a thing about the
underlying problem, but would expect some documentation
addition/patch.
Does any of you with enough context have sufficent time to write the
relevant text?
*t (going a bit through the release-notes bugs)
It's about the squeeze - wheezy (pointrelease) upgrade. Likely it's no longer
relevant for the upgrade to jessie and should get closed.
Thanks for investigating, Bye,
Joost
--- End Message ---