[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#533267: release-notes: Purging uninstalled packages



On Du, 23 nov 14, 22:54:20, Niels Thykier wrote:
> 
> Note, I opted for using dpkg -l + awk rather than aptitude, because a)
> all users have dpkg + awk and b) we have started recommending apt-get
> over aptitude again for upgrades.
 
Since aptitude is Priority: standard most systems will have it 
installed. Could it at lease be mentioned as alternative, as the command 
is much simpler?

> A review of the text is much appreciated.  Please CC me on relies.
..
>  
> -<programlisting condition="fixme">TODO: Still needed?</programlisting>
> +<section id="purge-removed-packages">
> +  <title>Purging removed packages</title>
> +  <para>
> +    It is generally advisable to purge packages have been removed.

s/packages have/packages that have/ though this might work as well

    It is generally advisable to purge removed packages.

> +    This is especially true, if these have been removed in an earlier
> +    release upgrade (e.g. from the upgrade to &oldreleasename;) or
> +    from third-party vendors.  In particular, old init.d scripts have
> +    been known to cause issues.
> +  </para>
> +  <caution>
> +    <para>
> +      Purging a package will generally also purge its log files
> +      permanently.  If you want to keep these, you should take
> +      a copy of them before purging the package.

Maybe s/take/make/, though I'd reword the entire paragraph.

    Purging a package will generally also purge its log files, so you 
    might want to back them up first.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: