Bug#681492: refcard: no license info at mentioned URL
Hello,
I'm sorry, I have discovered that this bug is not really solved:
The changing made by Osamu in
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/refcard/refcard.dbk?r1=8965&r2=9259
does not affect the refcard itself (the pdfs), but only the index.html page which is
also contained in the deb package (while I wonder where this html page is used,
but that's another story).
The pdfs from refcard version 5.0.9 still contain this invalid text:
This document may be used under the terms of the
GNU General Public License version 3 or higher.
Conditions for copying and translations can be found
at http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/refcard/,
where you can always get the latest version of the
reference card.
To get this in-line with above changing by Osamu, the attached patch
should be implemented (I copied the phrase from the refcard.dbk above).
Regards
Holger
--
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under the new
D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y !
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
Index: entries.dbk
===================================================================
--- entries.dbk (Revision 10247)
+++ entries.dbk (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -22,12 +22,10 @@
</copyright>
<legalnotice>
<para>This document may be used under the terms of the GNU General
- Public License version 3 or higher. Conditions for copying and
- translations can be found at <ulink
- url="http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/refcard/";>
- <literal>http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/refcard/</literal></ulink>,
- where you can always get the latest version of the reference
- card.</para>
+ Public License version 3 or higher. The license text can be found at <ulink
+ url="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html";>http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html</ulink>
+ and
+ <filename>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3</filename>.</para>
</legalnotice>
<keywordset>
<keyword>APT</keyword>
Reply to: