[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#696799: marked as done (release-notes: Upgrading udev section)

Your message dated Wed, 1 May 2013 19:01:07 +0200
with message-id <20130501170107.GA12846@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696799: release-notes: Upgrading udev section
has caused the Debian Bug report #696799,
regarding release-notes: Upgrading udev section
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
696799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal


Hello,

I think section 4.4.6 of the wheezy release notes

http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev

is wrong. Squeeze comes with a 2.6.32 kernel as default, 2.6.26 was the release before.

Should that section be deleted entirely?

Thanks
Rainer


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:21:33 +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:

> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I think section 4.4.6 of the wheezy release notes
> 
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#upgrading-udev
> 
> is wrong. Squeeze comes with a 2.6.32 kernel as default, 2.6.26 was the release before.
> 
> Should that section be deleted entirely?
> 
It's gone now.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: