[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706551: release-notes: drop "Package management" section from "What's new"



Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

On Apr 12 on debian-doc, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>> Neither is this something new, so why not just remove this old
>> notice?
> 
> Yes, sure, that would be an option.  I attach a version of my patch
> that removes this particular paragraph from whats-new.dbk; let's see
> if this gets us anywhere.

Nope.  Trying again as a bugreport.

Even disregarding the poorly phrased stuff about apt-get's
"non-interactive" CLI, this paragraph has got to go.  The advice it's
trying to give was originally addressed (in a less confusing form) to
people running *Etch* and upgrading to *Lenny*.  It is by no stretch
of the imagination a feature that's "new in Wheezy"!

If we want to keep some standard recommendation that upgrades should
always be done with apt-get rather than aptitude, that's exactly the
kind of material that belongs in the "upgrades" chapter, not in
"What's new in Debian GNU/Linux 7.0".
-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Index: whats-new.dbk
===================================================================
--- whats-new.dbk	(revision 9854)
+++ whats-new.dbk	(working copy)
@@ -402,18 +402,6 @@
 </para>
 </section>
 
-<section id="pkgmgmt">
-<title>Package management</title>
-<para>
-The preferred program for interactive package management from a terminal is
-<command>aptitude</command>. For a non-interactive command line interface
-for package management, it is recommended to use <command>apt-get</command>.
-<command>apt-get</command> is also the preferred tool for upgrades
-between major releases.
-</para>
-
-</section>
-
 <section id="multiarch">
 <title>Multiarch</title>
 <para>

Reply to: