Thanks a lot! I'll wait for your next revision of this patch, as we've
just discussed IRL.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:11:40AM +0000, Tim Marston wrote:
> --- en/upgrading.dbk (revision 9557)
> +++ en/upgrading.dbk (working copy)
> @@ -1227,6 +1227,31 @@
> may be required, either before or during the upgrade; these are detailed
> below on a per-package basis.
> +<section id="issues-sudo">
> +If you have modified <filename>/etc/sudoers</filename> then you should be aware
> +of changes made to how <systemitem role="package">sudo</systemitem>
> +configuration is handled. The deafult <filename>/etc/sudoers</filename> now
> +includes the following directive:
> +<programlisting>#includedir /etc/sudoers.d</programlisting>
> +You may wish to add this directive to the end of your
> +<filename>/etc/sudoers</filename>, as this won't be done automatically during
> +the upgrade. And you may also wish to consider migrating your changes to files
> +in the new <filename>/etc/sudoers.d</filename> directory.
> +Unless you also add a <literal>Defaults secure_path=</literal> entry to your
> +modified <filename>/etc/sudoers</filename>, you may find that <systemitem
> +role="package">sudo</systemitem> has an incomplete path. Specifying the fully
> +qualified path to commands will still work, however. See
> +<filename>usr/share/doc/sudo/NEWS.Debian</filename> for more information.
> <section id="issues-evolution">
> Tim Marston
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
> Archive: 20130127111140.GA16331@waxworlds.org">http://lists.debian.org/20130127111140.GA16331@waxworlds.org