[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#599222: marked as done (release-notes: devfs device names in how-to-recover solution2)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:52:15 +0100
with message-id <20110111195215.GA4678@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#599222: [PATCH] Don't use devfs device names in how-to-recover section
has caused the Debian Bug report #599222,
regarding release-notes: devfs device names in how-to-recover solution2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
599222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze

The "Solution 2" section in "How to recover from the problem after the
upgrade" suggests using installation media's rescue mode.  The example
of possible device names to choose from as the root fs should probably
be updated to non-devfs names.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 19:52:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> These names have been obsolete for a while, so they won't appear in
> d-i's rescue mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
> ---
>  en/upgrading.dbk |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/en/upgrading.dbk b/en/upgrading.dbk
> index 06fc6a8..ab71300 100644
> --- a/en/upgrading.dbk
> +++ b/en/upgrading.dbk
> @@ -1700,10 +1700,10 @@ initrd /initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686</screen>
>  	to use as root file system. The proposed choices will look
>  	something like:
>  
> -	<screen>/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
> -/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
> -/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5
> -/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6</screen>
> +	<screen>/dev/sda1
> +/dev/sda2
> +/dev/sda5
> +/dev/sda6</screen>
>        </para>
>  
>        <para>
committed in r8094.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: