Your message dated Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:00:37 +0100 with message-id <20110102210037.GA2739@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#599208: release-notes: drop kernel-package info? has caused the Debian Bug report #599208, regarding release-notes: drop kernel-package info? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599208: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599208 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release-notes: drop kernel-package info?
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:29:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20101005162957.GA3797@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
Package: release-notes Severity: minor Tags: squeeze The "kernel-metapackage" section of the release notes includes this text: <para> For the more adventurous there is an easy way to compile your own custom kernel on &debian;. Install the <systemitem role="package">kernel-package</systemitem> tool and read the documentation in <filename>/usr/share/doc/kernel-package</filename>. </para> AFAIK kernel-package is mostly deprecated these days in favour of the upstream 'make deb-pkg' target. Maybe this should be dropped or updated? (cc:ed to debian-kernel) Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>, 599208-done@bugs.debian.org, kernel-package@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#599208: release-notes: drop kernel-package info?
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:00:37 +0100
- Message-id: <20110102210037.GA2739@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <20101014233829.GD30777@javifsp.no-ip.org>
- References: <20101005162957.GA3797@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20101005165513.GT11856@jones.dk> <878w298e13.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <20101014233829.GD30777@javifsp.no-ip.org>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:38:29 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:11:20PM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > The stripped down build in deb package creator is by far not a > > drop in replacement of kernel package. > > Consequently, and to close this bug, I'm replacing the paragraph with: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > <para> > For the more adventurous there is an easy way to compile your own custom > kernel on &debian;. Install the <systemitem > role="package">kernel-package</systemitem> tool and read the documentation in > <filename>/usr/share/doc/kernel-package</filename>. Alternatively, > you can also the kernel sources, provided in the <systemitem > role="package">linux-source-2.6</systemitem> package. You can make use of the > <literal>dep-dpkg</literal> target available in the sources' makefile for > building a binary package. There are some differences in these two > approaches, please consult the respective package's documentation. > </para> > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IMHO the Release Notes document is not the place for any more detailed > information, the differences between these two approaches should be > documented in the respective packages. > Closing this bug. Thanks, Javier. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---