[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608067: marked as done (release-notes: should link to gpl2 instead of gpl3)



Your message dated Sun, 2 Jan 2011 16:52:54 +0100
with message-id <20110102155254.GA24018@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#608067: release-notes: Wrong FSF postal address - and GPL Vx discrepancies
has caused the Debian Bug report #608067,
regarding release-notes: should link to gpl2 instead of gpl3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes

Today I noticed some things regarding the GPL section of the 
release-notes:

1. the postal address of the FSF is no longer correct.
   It is:	Free Software Foundation
		51 Franklin Street, Suite 500
		Boston, MA 02110-1335
		USA 

   see http://www.fsf.org/about/contact/

2. At the beginning of that chapter we are talking about GPL V2,
   but the link http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html goes to
   GPL V3 at FSF page. 
   And the chapter also directs to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.

   So, is this document is still under GPL V2?
   Then the link has to be changed to 
   http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html

   Or if we switch to GPL V3, the link on the harddisc has to be
   changed to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3.



Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
    under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
        Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 22:43:06 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:

> 2. At the beginning of that chapter we are talking about GPL V2,
>    but the link http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html goes to
>    GPL V3 at FSF page. 
>    And the chapter also directs to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.
> 
>    So, is this document is still under GPL V2?
>    Then the link has to be changed to 
>    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html
> 
Fixed.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: