[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#515312: release-notes: Correct spelling of codename: lenny

Osamu Aoki wrote:

> I know it is correct to spell proper names capitalized as "Lenny" in the
> proper English grammar.
> But I still think "Lenny" in "Release notes" should have been "lenny" if
> we follow recent historic usages.
> Here is the fact about recent news:
> February 14th, 2009     Debian GNU/Linux version 5.0 (codenamed "Lenny")
> April     8th, 2007     Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (codename etch)
> June      6th, 2005     Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (codename `sarge')
> July     19th, 2002     Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (`woody') (Release Notes)
> August   15th, 2000     Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (codename `potato') (Release Notes)
> December 15th, 1999     Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 release (aka slink)
> July     24th, 1998     Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 'Hamm' Released
> June      2nd, 1997     Debian 1.3 Released (no mention of "bo" in news)
> Only Hamm used capitalization!

At http://www.debian.org/releases/lenny/i386/release-notes/ I see

	Release Notes for Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (lenny), Intel x86

although throughout the release notes both "lenny" (&releasename;)
and "Lenny" (&Releasename;) were used.  In the trunk (squeeze)
release notes I find:

I. en/issues.dbk:

 -    Due to an unfortunate interaction of a kernel fix with PCI Express
 :    subsystem, Lenny default kernel will fail to boot on Sparc
 -    workstations with PCI Express slots, like Ultra 25 and Ultra

which is probably out of date;

II. en/release-notes.dbk:

 -      <firstname>Christian</firstname>
 -      <surname>Perrier</surname>
 :      <contrib>Lenny installation</contrib>

(and similar), which do not form part of the output;

III. &Nextreleasename; etc in some translations, which presumably have
their own rules.

Is there something left to fix?

Reply to: