Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:11:03 -0800 with message-id <20101225211103.GD9422@virgil.dodds.net> and subject line Re: Bug#607719: release-notes: Spelling error has caused the Debian Bug report #607719, regarding release-notes: Spelling error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 607719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607719 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release-notes: Spelling error
- From: Mathew Meins <mathewm@internode.on.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:14:44 +1100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20101221121444.10209.6829.reportbug@sputnik.skynet.local>
Package: release-notes Severity: minor Tags: patch Found a minor spelling error in upgrading.dbk, under section 4.11 (Obsolete packages.) I suspect this is supposed to be "than for thousand", rather than "thanfor thousand." 1896c1896 < thanfor thousand old packages that were in &oldreleasename;. It provides no upgrade path --- > than four thousand old packages that were in &oldreleasename;. It provides no upgrade path -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Mathew Meins <mathewm@internode.on.net>, 607719-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#607719: release-notes: Spelling error
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:11:03 -0800
- Message-id: <20101225211103.GD9422@virgil.dodds.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20101221121444.10209.6829.reportbug@sputnik.skynet.local>
- References: <[🔎] 20101221121444.10209.6829.reportbug@sputnik.skynet.local>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:14:44PM +1100, Mathew Meins wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > Found a minor spelling error in upgrading.dbk, under section 4.11 (Obsolete > packages.) I suspect this is supposed to be "than for thousand", rather than > "thanfor thousand." Fixed in svn, thanks! > 1896c1896 > < thanfor thousand old packages that were in &oldreleasename;. It provides no upgrade path > --- > > than four thousand old packages that were in &oldreleasename;. It provides no upgrade path Please note that the standard diff format used in Debian is unified diff (diff -u); old-style diffs like this one don't stand up very well to changes to the surrounding contents of the file, so in general it would be worth your while to submit unified diffs instead. (In this case it hardly mattered, I applied the diff by hand anyway. :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.orgAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---