[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: is lilo ever installed by default anymore?

Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org):
> Hi all,
> I'm working on cleaning up the release notes for the squeeze release, and in
> the section on post-upgrade lilo handling, we have this note, which is
> carried over from lenny (where it referred to etch):
>   If you are using lilo as your bootloader (it is the default bootloader for
>   some installations of lenny) it is strongly recommended that you rerun lilo
>   after the upgrade.
> Can anyone confirm that it's actually the case in lenny that lilo is used by
> default is some situations?  I'm not sure where in d-i to look for this.

Looking around in D-I SVN, I see no code under "packages/" that says
"don't install grub-installer and use lilo-installer instead".

So, only the packages' priorities and the Menu-Item number can give
precedence of one over the other....

Packages are "Priority: standard" and grub-installer has a lower menu
entry number. 

So, in short, I don't see any default install path where users would
end up with lilo-installer being executed in place of grub-installer.

The only path seems to be an expert install and explicitly choosing to
install LILO instead of GRUB.

So, I would say that LILO is no longer the default installer for some
installations of lenny.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: