[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#447774: marked as done (Please mention proposed-updates)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:20:07 +0100
with message-id <20090225152007.GH1980@dedibox.ebzao.info>
and subject line Closing "pending" Lenny release-notes bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #447774,
regarding Please mention proposed-updates
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
447774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447774
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes

Hi
It would be good to introduce proposed-updates in the Release Notes IMHO. Many people don't know proposed-updates exist, nor do they know that it's the basis for the next point release. Some people get even frustrated because it takes a lot of time to have some bugs fixed in stable while the fix is already in proposed-updates...
It would be far better if more people used proposed-updates so it gets more testing and we can make sure point releases would have even better quality. Unfortunately some recent issues were only found after a point release... 

Cheers

Luk

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:31:39PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "Simon Paillard" <simon.paillard@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>:
>> Can we :
>> - asssume all pending bugs have been commited to SVN ?
>
> Yes.

Closing Lenny release-notes pending bugs, since the relevant patches have been
commited to SVN trunk and are published on line at
http://debian.org/releases/lenny/releasenotes

Sorry for the mass mail.

-- 
Simon Paillard

--- End Message ---
Reply to: