Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian
(keep me CC-ed)
2009/2/6 W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>:
> Quoting Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
>> Still, I am wondering, why wasn't Romanian using dblatex in the first place?
>
> To be honest: I don't remember. I will test some stuff on my
> etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds
> with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK?
Excellent. Note that I haven't committed yet the changes. I will when
I'll get home (in about an hour or so).
About the backport, do you already have a backport for all the needed
packages? I know dblatex and xmlroff are needed, but IIRC some of the
tex stuff was necessary, too (for UTF-8 support, for example). Or am I
confusing etch release build system with lenny's?
--
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
Reply to: