[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#515062: marked as done (release-notes: Check libfam0 instead of libfam0c102?)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:36:59 +0200
with message-id <20090821193659.GA2788@nekral.nekral.homelinux.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#515062: release-notes: Check libfam0 instead of libfam0c102?
has caused the Debian Bug report #515062,
regarding release-notes: Check libfam0 instead of libfam0c102?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
515062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: patch


Hi,

"4.5.6.1. Upgrading a desktop system" in the lenny release notes asks
users to check libfam0c102 for the desktop system and to install
libfam0.  However, libfam0c102 is not installed in pure etch desktop
systems.  In my desktop environment, the following command line results
in nothing:

  # dpkg -l libfam0c102 | grep ^ii

Since libfam0 seems to have replaced libfam0c102 in etch, "checking
libfam0c102 and installing libfam0" is only correct in the sarge->etch
upgrade.  IMHO, users should check libfam0 itself before installing it
in the etch->lenny upgrade instead (although I have not checked it
because I don't have an environment for testing it).  Could you please
consider applying this patch?

Since this patch changes nothing but package names.  So, unfuzzying
translations is easy.

Sorry for my too late bug report.

Best regards,

-nori


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable'), (80, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Index: en/upgrading.dbk
===================================================================
--- en/upgrading.dbk	(リビジョン 6435)
+++ en/upgrading.dbk	(作業コピー)
@@ -936,11 +936,11 @@
 or with the the GNOME or KDE packages installed.
 </para>
 <para>
-Check whether you have the  <systemitem role="package">libfam0c102</systemitem>
+Check whether you have the  <systemitem role="package">libfam0</systemitem>
 package installed:
 </para>
 <screen>
-# dpkg -l libfam0c102 | grep ^ii
+# dpkg -l libfam0 | grep ^ii
 </screen>
 <para>
 If you do have it installed, run:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello,

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:14:16PM +0900, Noritada Kobayashi wrote:
> 
> "4.5.6.1. Upgrading a desktop system" in the lenny release notes asks
> users to check libfam0c102 for the desktop system and to install
> libfam0.  However, libfam0c102 is not installed in pure etch desktop
> systems.  In my desktop environment, the following command line results
> in nothing:
> 
>   # dpkg -l libfam0c102 | grep ^ii
> 
> Since libfam0 seems to have replaced libfam0c102 in etch, "checking
> libfam0c102 and installing libfam0" is only correct in the sarge->etch
> upgrade.  IMHO, users should check libfam0 itself before installing it
> in the etch->lenny upgrade instead (although I have not checked it
> because I don't have an environment for testing it).  Could you please
> consider applying this patch?
> 
> Since this patch changes nothing but package names.  So, unfuzzying
> translations is easy.
> 
> Sorry for my too late bug report.


Thanks for your report.

The complete section was removed as it was no more valid for the
Etch->Lenny upgrade.
(revision 6665)


Best Regards,
-- 
Nekral

--- End Message ---
Reply to: