[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#512690: marked as done (section 4.10 (Deprecated packages) is outdated)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:20:07 +0100
with message-id <20090225152007.GH1980@dedibox.ebzao.info>
and subject line Closing "pending" Lenny release-notes bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #512690,
regarding section 4.10 (Deprecated packages) is outdated
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
512690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512690
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

I posted this to -release, too, but just to make sure there's a record
of it:

The "Deprecated [server] packages" packages section in the release notes
is unchanged from etch.  Is there a list anywhere of major server
packages that will be released with lenny but which are already
scheduled for removal for squeeze?  The only example I can come up with
might be uw-imapd, which has apparently been just about completely
abandoned upstream, although there's no obvious choice for a replacement
yet.

noah

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 01:31:39PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "Simon Paillard" <simon.paillard@resel.enst-bretagne.fr>:
>> Can we :
>> - asssume all pending bugs have been commited to SVN ?
>
> Yes.

Closing Lenny release-notes pending bugs, since the relevant patches have been
commited to SVN trunk and are published on line at
http://debian.org/releases/lenny/releasenotes

Sorry for the mass mail.

-- 
Simon Paillard

--- End Message ---
Reply to: